Nerds history

 Jallianwala Bagh Massacre: a brutal massacre Jallianwala Bagh incident was an outcome of Rowlatt act(black act) . India witnessed brutal massacre of people unarmed, gathered and started protesting against Rowlatt act in a calm and non-violent manner. The massacre was carried on by the orders of General Reginald Dyer.  A short distance away from the Golden Temple complex is a spacious park, Jallianwala Bagh. As per British government estimates about 379 people died and about 1200 were wounded. While INC estimates of death toll was around 1500. 10 minutes of non-stop firing. firing was stopped only after all the ammunitions were depleted. around 1650 rounds of bullets were used. surprisingly, soldiers who were firing were Indians. Indians firing Indians with an order of a single British general. With his troops, Dyer entered the Bagh through a narrow alley, the only entry and exit path. The 1920 report noted that Dyer entered Jallianwala Bagh with  25 Gorkha soldiers and 25 Baluchis ar

 

 Aug 15 1947   Amidst the resounding echoes of history, as the clock strikes the midnight hour a nation's heartbeat reverberates with the spirit of freedom !! Such a good news !! But speaking reality did India really get its independence on 15th august 1947 ?? At the stroke of midnight of 14-15th august the British rule came to an end and power was transferred to the two new "**dominion**" nations.(India and Pak) i.e., India stood as only a dominion country with England being the head state of India !! Eventually, its is only in 1950 India has become an independent "republic" nation!!

 Thoughts on this?? :-

 

last letter by Bhagat Singh   To The Punjab Governor Sir, With due respect we beg to bring to your kind notice the following: That we were sentenced to death on 7th October 1930 by a British Court, L.C.C Tribunal, constituted under the Sp. Lahore Conspiracy Case Ordinance, promulgated by the H.E. The Viceroy, the Head of the British Government of India, and that the main charge against us was that of having waged war against H.M. King George, the King of England. The above-mentioned finding of the Court pre-supposed two things: Firstly, that there exists a state of war between the British Nation and the Indian Nation and, secondly, that we had actually participated in that war and were therefore war prisoners. The second pre-supposition seems to be a little bit flattering, but nevertheless it is too tempting to resist the desire of acquiescing in it. As regards the first, we are constrained to go into some detail. Apparently there seems to be no such war as the phrase indicates. Nevert

Nehruvian rule are these just FLAWS or a complete SABOTAGE  rejected a permanent seat in UN rejected Baluchistan's offer to join Bharat  created Kashmir issue  presided over disastrous Sino-Bharat war curbed journalistic freedom and freedom expression  failure to promote , encourage and implement universal primary education undemocratically nominated as prime minister of India. Didn't allow sardar Patel to become prime minister giving away Manipur's kabo valley to Burma refusing sultan of Oman's offer of Gwadar port  obstructing sardar Patel's plan to liberate Hyderabad impractical approach in integrating Kashmir with India taking Kashmir issue to UNSC throttled industrialization  neglected agriculture disastrous five year plans and their poor implementation etc maltreatment of : INA Netaji Bose bhagat Singh and Azad veer Savarkar etc special treatment of : Edwina Mountbatten Disclaimer : this is not subjected to demean anyone or any political party. just trying to